Alex Murdaugh's Prosecutors Gave the Judge the Same Answer They Gave About Becky Hill

In January 2024, the South Carolina Attorney General's office told Judge Jean Toal that Becky Hill's comments to the Alex Murdaugh jury didn't matter because the evidence was overwhelming. In May 2026, five Supreme Court justices threw the convictions out. On November 6, 2026, the same office told Judge Debra McCaslin that its lead agent's wrong grand jury testimony about the shirt and the shotguns didn't matter either, because the grand jury had probable cause without it.

The State concedes the no-human-blood lab report never reached its spatter expert and sat in agent David Owen's email for a year. It calls that inadvertent. Alex's lawyers want the indictments dismissed without prejudice so a grand jury that never heard the spatter claim can decide again. I put both filings next to the Supreme Court's own words about the word overwhelming. Alex is presumed innocent. The hearing is November 13.

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#MurdaughMurders #AlexMurdaugh #TrueCrimeToday #MurdaughRetrial #BeckyHill #SLED #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime